Martha S. Cruz v. Brad Beck
This text of Martha S. Cruz v. Brad Beck (Martha S. Cruz v. Brad Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-09-00083-CV
Martha S. CRUZ, Appellant
v.
Brad BECK, et al., Appellee
From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CI-17431 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 17, 2009
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On February 26, 2009, appellant filed an Affidavit of Inability, asserting she does not have
the necessary finances to pay for the clerk’s record or reporter’s record in this appeal. On March 4,
2009, we abated this cause to the trial court for a determination of whether the appeal is frivolous.
On March 17, 2009, the trial court conducted a hearing on this issue and concluded appellant’s 04-09-00083-CV
appeal was frivolous and, therefore, she was not entitled to a free record on appeal. Accordingly,
on April 3, 2009, this court ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court no later than April
13, 2009 that the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee
for preparation of the clerk’s record. Our order informed appellant that if she failed to respond
within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP .
P. 37.3(b). Appellant responded with a letter to this court stating she was unable to pay for the
clerk’s record and that she should not be required to pay for the record.
On May 1, 2009, this court again ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court no
later than May 18, 2009 that the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay
the clerk’s fee for preparation of the clerk’s record. Our order informed appellant that if she failed
to provide such written proof, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX . R.
APP . P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not responded.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martha S. Cruz v. Brad Beck, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martha-s-cruz-v-brad-beck-texapp-2009.