Martha Pustejovsky v. Wendy Collini, M.D.
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-11-00164-CV
|
Martha Pustejovsky |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Wendy Collini, M.D. |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM THE 48th District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered “Appellant's Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: August 11, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martha Pustejovsky v. Wendy Collini, M.D. (Martha Pustejovsky v. Wendy Collini, M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.