MARTHA MILLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

253 So. 3d 768
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 2018
Docket17-3931
StatusPublished

This text of 253 So. 3d 768 (MARTHA MILLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MARTHA MILLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 253 So. 3d 768 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MARTHA M. MILLER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3931 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed August 31, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Ronald Ficarrotta, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we

affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following the revocation of

Ms. Miller's probation without comment. However, our independent review of the record reveals a technical error which does not affect the outcome of the case but for which we

must remand for entry of a corrected revocation order.

The revocation order states in relevant part that Ms. Miller "admitted

violating Conditions (5), (7) and the Order of Modification of Probation." However, Ms.

Miller did not admit to violating the order of modification. Accordingly, we affirm Ms.

Miller's judgment and sentence; however, we remand with directions that the trial court

correct the revocation order to reflect only that Ms. Miller admitted to violating conditions

five and seven of her probation. See Rodgers v. State, 171 So. 3d 803, 803 (Fla. 2d

DCA 2015) ("When a trial court relies on both proper and improper grounds for

revocation but it is clear from the record that the trial court would have revoked

probation even without the existence of improper grounds, this court and others have

affirmed the revocation of probation and remanded for entry of a corrected revocation

order." (quoting Lee v. State, 67 So. 3d 1199, 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011))).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Lee v. State
67 So. 3d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Rodgers v. State
171 So. 3d 803 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 So. 3d 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martha-miller-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.