Martha Lopez Lopez v. Jefferson Sessions

694 F. App'x 525
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 19, 2017·No. 13-70931·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Martha Lopez Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding her removable. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims. Martinez-Medina v. Holder, 673 F.3d 1029, 1033 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not err or violate due process in finding Lopez Lopez removable as charged, because Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder forecloses her contention that her statements to immigration officials at the border were unconstitutionally obtained in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c). 558 F.3d 897, 901-02 (9th Cir. 2009); see Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (an alien must show error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martha Lopez Lopez v. Jefferson Sessions, 694 F. App'x 525 (9th Cir. 2017).

694 F. App'x 525 (Martha Lopez Lopez v. Jefferson Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder
558 F.3d 897 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Martinez-Medina v. Holder
673 F.3d 1029 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)