Martha Barron v. Fernando Barron

Opinion

Opinion issued August 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c)

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-16-00175-CV ——————————— MARTHA BARRON, Appellant V. FERNANDO BARRON, Appellee On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-27372 MEMORANDUM OPINION Martha Barron has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial