Martha A. Gregory D/B/A Workzone Technologies v. Porter & Hedges, LLP
This text of Martha A. Gregory D/B/A Workzone Technologies v. Porter & Hedges, LLP (Martha A. Gregory D/B/A Workzone Technologies v. Porter & Hedges, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed, April 19, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-12-00197-CV ____________
MARTHA A. GREGORY D/B/A WORKZONE TECHNOLOGIES, Appellant
V.
PORTER & HEDGES, LLP, Appellee
On Appeal from the 269th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008-07491
ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 1, 2012, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On April 3, 2012, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 15 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.
We order Kathleen Keese, the official court reporter and Annette Peltier, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Kathleen Keese and Annette Peltier does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martha A. Gregory D/B/A Workzone Technologies v. Porter & Hedges, LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martha-a-gregory-dba-workzone-technologies-v-porte-texapp-2012.