Martes, E., Aplt v. PPB
This text of Martes, E., Aplt v. PPB (Martes, E., Aplt v. PPB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ELYN J. MARTES, : No. 33 MAP 2023 : Appellant : : v. : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION : AND PAROLE, : : Appellees :
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2023, as the statement of questions presented in
the jurisdictional statement does not address the Commonwealth Court’s rationale, the
notice of appeal is quashed. See Pa.R.A.P. 910(a)(5) (“Only the questions set forth in
the [jurisdictional] statement, or fairly comprised therein[,] will ordinarily be considered by
the Court.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martes, E., Aplt v. PPB, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martes-e-aplt-v-ppb-pa-2023.