Martens v. Martens
262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 72
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We do not here find such unusual circumstances as would take the ease out of the general rule that counsel fee and allowance for disbursements should only be granted for prospective and not past services.
It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied, without costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martens v. Martens, 262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 72 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 702 (Martens v. Martens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sussman v. Sussman
13 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)