Martens v. Martens

262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 72
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 702 (Martens v. Martens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martens v. Martens, 262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 72 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We do not here find such unusual circumstances as would take the ease out of the general rule that counsel fee and allowance for disbursements should only be granted for prospective and not past services.

It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sussman v. Sussman
13 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martens-v-martens-nyappdiv-1941.