Martens v. Martens
This text of 262 A.D. 702 (Martens v. Martens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We do not here find such unusual circumstances as would take the ease out of the general rule that counsel fee and allowance for disbursements should only be granted for prospective and not past services.
It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied, without costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martens-v-martens-nyappdiv-1941.