Martello v. VANDERCLOK

345 S.W.3d 392, 2011 WL 3569327
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2011·No. ED 95651·Published

Opinion

*393 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew T. Martello (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motions to dismiss filed by defendants, Marie Vanderklok, Touchpoint Autism Services fik/a The Judevine Center for Autism (Touchpoint), and Rebecca Blackwell (collectively, Defendants). 1 We have reviewed de novo the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

1

. Martello’s claims against defendants Missouri Division of Elementary & Secondary Education and Behavioral Analysis Certification Board were also dismissed, but he does not appeal those dismissals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martello v. VANDERCLOK, 345 S.W.3d 392, 2011 WL 3569327 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

345 S.W.3d 392 (Martello v. VANDERCLOK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.