Martell v. Martell

7 A.D.2d 641, 179 N.Y.S.2d 533

This text of 7 A.D.2d 641 (Martell v. Martell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martell v. Martell, 7 A.D.2d 641, 179 N.Y.S.2d 533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

In an action to compel the transfer of an alleged 25% stock interest in a [642]*642corporation and for an accounting of dividends and profits in connection therewith, the appeal is from so much of an order as struck, on respondents’ motion, certain items from appellant’s notice to examine respondents before trial. Order modified by striking from the first ordering paragraph the words and figures items 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 ”, and by substituting in lieu thereof the word and figure item 7 ”. As so modified, order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. The items hereby allowed are necessary for the establishment of appellant’s fight to an accounting; she is entitled, therefore, to examine respondents upon said items (Muller v. Ackerman, 246 App. Div. 849; Wertheim v. Grombecker, 229 App. Div. 16; Berger v. Goldstein, 10 Misc 2d 149). Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wertheim v. Grombecker
229 A.D. 16 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Muller v. Ackerman
246 A.D. 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Berger v. Goldstein
10 Misc. 2d 149 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 A.D.2d 641, 179 N.Y.S.2d 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martell-v-martell-nyappdiv-1958.