Martel v. Allen
713 N.W.2d 766, 475 Mich. 857
Opinion
Karen MARTEL and Steve Martel, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Jacqueline Bauer and Glen Bauer, Plaintiffs,
v.
Cindy Gay ALLEN, Defendant, Cross-Defendant, and
Steak & Ale of Michigan, Inc., a/k/a Bennigan's, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Khirfan's Inc., Defendant, and
Labelle Management, Inc., Douglas N. Labelle, and Barton W. Labelle, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martel v. Allen, 713 N.W.2d 766, 475 Mich. 857 (Mich. 2006).
713 N.W.2d 766 (Martel v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chambers v. Lehmann
713 N.W.2d 766 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)