Martel v. Allen
713 N.W.2d 766, 475 Mich. 857
This text of 713 N.W.2d 766 (Martel v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Martel v. Allen, 713 N.W.2d 766, 475 Mich. 857 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Karen MARTEL and Steve Martel, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Jacqueline Bauer and Glen Bauer, Plaintiffs,
v.
Cindy Gay ALLEN, Defendant, Cross-Defendant, and
Steak & Ale of Michigan, Inc., a/k/a Bennigan's, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Khirfan's Inc., Defendant, and
Labelle Management, Inc., Douglas N. Labelle, and Barton W. Labelle, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chambers v. Lehmann
713 N.W.2d 766 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
713 N.W.2d 766, 475 Mich. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martel-v-allen-mich-2006.