Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Marte v. City of New York

Marte v. City of New York

292 A.D.2d 311, 739 N.Y.S.2d 267, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3256
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 28, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 292 A.D.2d 311 (Marte v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marte v. City of New York, 292 A.D.2d 311, 739 N.Y.S.2d 267, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, JJ, entered January 6, 2000, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiff’s motion to renew a prior order dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The expert affidavit submitted by plaintiff in support of the motion fails to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Mendes v Whitney-Floral Realty Corp., 216 AD2d 540, lv denied 87 NY2d 803) that would support a motion to renew based on new facts (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mendes v. Whitney-Floral Realty Corp.
216 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 A.D.2d 311, 739 N.Y.S.2d 267, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marte-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2002.