Marte v. Berkman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marte v. Berkman

70 A.D.3d 493, 895 N.Y.S.2d 376

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 A.D.3d 493 (Marte v. Berkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marte v. Berkman, 70 A.D.3d 493, 895 N.Y.S.2d 376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinions

Application pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition seeking, on the ground of double jeopardy, to prevent retrial of petitioners before respondent Justice under New York County indictment No. 2420/08, denied, and the proceeding dismissed, without costs.

DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ., concur in a separate memorandum by Freedman, J.; Sweeny and McGuire, JJ., concur in a separate memorandum by McGuire, J.; Tom, J.E, dissents in a memorandum, as follow:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition seeking, on the ground of double jeopardy, to prevent retrial of petitioners before respondent Justice under New York County indictment No. 2420/08, denied, and the proceeding dismissed, without costs.

DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ., concur in a separate memorandum by Freedman, J.; Sweeny and McGuire, JJ., concur in a separate memorandum by McGuire, J.; Tom, J.E, dissents in a memorandum, as follow:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.3d 493, 895 N.Y.S.2d 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marte-v-berkman-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack