Marston v. Wood
This text of 444 So. 2d 1141 (Marston v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION ON REMAND
This Court’s opinion, reported at 425 So.2d 582 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), was reviewed by the supreme court by certiorari proceedings. Upon issuance of the mandate quashing our opinion and remanding for certain further determination, we accordingly adopt the supreme court’s opinion shown as Wood v. Marston, 442 So.2d 934 (Fla.1983).
That court’s opinion noted our initial declination to determine the issue of appel-lees’ entitlement to attorney’s fees but which by the reversal is now proper for consideration and this Court’s disposition. Upon further review we find and hold that appellees are due attorney’s fees and costs as provided by section 286.011(4) and in further explication adopt as our reasoning Judge Wigginton’s dissent relating to this subject at 425 So.2d 582, 588.
We reinstate the attorney's fees and costs awarded the appellees by the trial judge. We also grant appellees' motion for award of fees in representing appellees before this Court and approve the previously stipulated amount of $17,500 as a reasonable fee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 So. 2d 1141, 15 Educ. L. Rep. 1401, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marston-v-wood-fladistctapp-1984.