Marston v. Strafford Savings Bank

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Marston v. Strafford Savings Bank

45 A. 1007, 69 N.H. 669

DecidedJune 5, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A. 1007 (Marston v. Strafford Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marston v. Strafford Savings Bank, 45 A. 1007, 69 N.H. 669 (N.H. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Parsons, J.

The finding of the trial court, that none of the facts upon which the plaintiff relied to sustain her allegation of fraud in the judgment against her were proved, disposes of the questions raised. No question of law has been presented. The only question of law which might have been raised on the facts is settled in Bergeron v. Bank, 62 N. H. 655; S. C., 63 N. H. 195.

Case discharged.

Wallace and Pike, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parsons, J.

The finding of the trial court, that none of the facts upon which the plaintiff relied to sustain her allegation of fraud in the judgment against her were proved, disposes of the questions raised. No question of law has been presented. The only question of law which might have been raised on the facts is settled in Bergeron v. Bank, 62 N. H. 655; S. C., 63 N. H. 195.

Case discharged.

Wallace and Pike, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A. 1007, 69 N.H. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marston-v-strafford-savings-bank-nh-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack