Marsteller v. Coryell

4 Va. 325
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1833
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Va. 325 (Marsteller v. Coryell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marsteller v. Coryell, 4 Va. 325 (Va. 1833).

Opinion

Tucker, P.

The trustees of the town of Alexandria conveyed the premises in question to Janies M'Leod, who died leaving Robert M’Leod bis heir at law; he conveyed to Richard Arell, who died leaving the plaintiffs his heirs at law. Thus, the title is complete. Arell had received possession from a purchaser by verbal contract under James M’Leod, held possession for many years, without interruption, till his death, and died in possession. Coryell took possession a year afterwards; which was the trespass complained of. The point on which the district court decided the cause, was, doubtless, that there was no entry by ArelVs heirs after his death; for until entry, the heir cannot maintain trespass against an intruder. But, as there is proof that Arell died in possession, we think that, on a demurrer to evidence, an actual possession in his heirs eo instante that he died, may fairly be presumed; and, therefore, that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover in this action.

Judgement reversed, and judgement entered for the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Midgeley
101 A.2d 51 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Va. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsteller-v-coryell-va-1833.