Marsoff v. Fast

151 N.Y.S. 418
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1914·Published

Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

Under the well-settled rule that transitory actions should be tried in the county where the transactions involved in the controversy took place, unless a large preponderance of the witnesses live in another county (Fluckiger v. Haber, 144 App. Div. 65, 128 N. Y. Supp. 739, and cases there cited), this motion to change the venue to Greene county should be granted. It was there that the accident occurred, and the plaintiff has failed to show that the majority of the witnesses live in or near Bronx county, in which she has brought her action. On the contrary, even assuming that the two witnesses whose residence is in dispute reside in New York City, still a greater number who have actual knowledge of the circumstances of the accident and-its effect on the plaintiff, and her statements as to such circumstances and effects, undisputedly reside in Greene county.

The motion is granted, with $10 costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marsoff v. Fast, 151 N.Y.S. 418 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1914).

151 N.Y.S. 418 (Marsoff v. Fast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fluckiger v. Haber
144 A.D. 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)