Marsland v. Julien

334 So. 2d 265, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15688
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 1976·No. No. 75-792·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in a medical malpractice action appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant. We find error, and reverse.

Upon examination of the record, and consideration of the briefs and argument, we hold a genuine issue of material fact was presented, as to whether there was informed consent of the plaintiff (patient) for the operation. No useful purpose would be served by reciting the deposition testimony of the parties bearing thereon. With regard to negligence as an issue in the case, see Helms v. Sims, Fla.App.1976, 330 So.2d 71, recently decided by this court.

The summary judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marsland v. Julien, 334 So. 2d 265, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15688 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

334 So. 2d 265 (Marsland v. Julien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. State
334 So. 2d 265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)