Marsh's Adm'r v. Elsworth

37 Ala. 85
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

STONE, J.

The statute of the State of Mississippi, copied into the bill, preserves only a statute lien .on property Bold as this was. At does not prevent the title from passing to the purchaser, Such lien being .only one of the incidents given by the ]aw, .it results that, as against a purchaser, who, in good faith, acquires title within another jurisdiction-,- such lieu can have no binding operation ip the new jurisdiction. —See Donald v. Hewitt, and authorities cited, 33 Ala. 534, 545-6.

..Decree.of the chancellor affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marsh's Adm'r v. Elsworth, 37 Ala. 85 (Ala. 1860).

37 Ala. 85 (Marsh's Adm'r v. Elsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Driver v. J. T. Fargason Co.
288 F. 671 (Eighth Circuit, 1923)
J. T. Fargason Co. v. Furst
287 F. 306 (Eighth Circuit, 1923)
Albany Warehouse Co. v. F. B. Fisk Cotton Co.
67 So. 728 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)
Schuler v. T. M. McCord Co.
81 N.W. 547 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1900)
Weinstein v. Freyer
93 Ala. 257 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)