Marshburn v. . Brown

186 S.E. 265, 210 N.C. 331, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 95
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 186 S.E. 265 (Marshburn v. . Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshburn v. . Brown, 186 S.E. 265, 210 N.C. 331, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 95 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

This is an action to enjoin the defendant J. T. Brown, sheriff of Pender County, from selling lands owned by the plaintiffs and located in *Page 332 Maple Hill School District, Holly Township, Pender County, in accordance with notices posted by him, as required by statute, for the collection of taxes levied on said lands by the defendant board of county commissioners of Pender County for the year 1933, on the ground that said taxes were levied for the purpose of raising money to pay the obligations, evidenced by bonds and otherwise of certain school districts in Pender County other than Maple Hill School District, and for that reason were levied on the lands of the plaintiffs without lawful authority, and are therefore illegal, and also to enjoin the defendant board of county commissioners of Pender County from levying taxes on said lands for the year 1934, and for succeeding years, for said purpose.

Prior to 3 July, 1933, the board of county commissioners of Pender County, at the request of the board of education of said county, and with the approval of a majority of the qualified voters in each of said school districts, as required by law, for and in behalf of certain school districts in said county, had issued bonds in the name of Pender County, and had otherwise contracted indebtedness for the purpose of constructing and equipping schoolhouses in said district. The said bonds at the time they were issued, and the said indebtedness at the time it was contracted, were and are now the valid obligations of the said school districts. By statutory authority, taxes had been levied by the board of county commissioners of Pender County, from year to year, on property, real and personal, located in said school districts, for the purpose of raising money to pay said bonds and said indebtedness.

On 3 July, 1933, the board of county commissioners of Pender County, at a meeting held on said day, made and caused to be entered in its minutes an order as follows:

"It is ordered that the county assume the debt service obligations of the various school districts in the county."

Pursuant to said order, and in accordance with the budget requirements of the board of education of Pender County, the board of county commissioners of said county, for the year 1933, levied a tax of 43 cents on the $100.00 valuation on all the property, real and personal, in said county subject to taxation, for the purpose of raising money to pay the indebtedness, evidenced by bonds or otherwise, of said county for school purposes, including the indebtedness of the various school districts in the county contracted for the construction and equipment of schoolhouses in said districts. No bonds had been issued or indebtedness contracted by Maple Hill School District, or in its behalf. The plaintiffs have failed and refused to pay the taxes levied on their lands located in Maple Hill School District, and the defendant J. T. Brown, sheriff of Pender County, has advertised the said lands for sale for the purpose of collecting said taxes, and will sell the same unless enjoined from so doing by judgment in this action. *Page 333

The defendant board of county commissioners of Pender County has approved the budget of the board of education of said county for the year 1934, which will require that a tax be levied on all the property, real and personal, in Pender County, for the purpose of raising money to pay the indebtedness of the various school districts of said county incurred for the construction and equipment of schoolhouses in said districts. Unless enjoined in this action, the defendant board of county commissioners of Pender County will levy said tax for the year 1934, and for succeeding years.

In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the schoolhouses constructed in the various school districts in Pender County and paid for with the proceeds of the bonds issued by or in behalf of said school districts, or with money borrowed for that purpose, were not essential or necessary for the operation in said districts of schools for the minimum school term of six months in each year, as required by the constitution of this State. This allegation is denied by the defendants. In their answer the defendants allege that said schoolhouses were and are essential and necessary for the operation of schools in said district, in accordance with the mandate of the Constitution of the State of North Carolina.

At a meeting held after the commencement of this action, to wit: On 4 February, 1935, the board of county commissioners of Pender County adopted and caused to be entered in its minutes a resolution as follows:

"Whereas, the board of education of Pender County, on 3 July, 1933, adopted a resolution providing that the debt service obligations of the special taxing districts and other school districts of Pender County should be taken over for payment by the county as a whole and the local districts relieved of their payment, said obligations being included in the debt service fund in the six months budget; and

"Whereas, the same was certified to the board of county commissioners of Pender County and approved by said board, and said board, pursuant to said approval, adopted the following resolution:

"`It is ordered that the county assume the debt service obligations of the various taxing school districts in the county'; and

"Whereas, it has been discovered that essential facts were inadvertently omitted from the drafts of the resolutions adopted by the board of education and by the board of county commissioners, which facts were true at the time the resolutions were adopted, and still are true; and

"Whereas, on this 4 February, 1935, the said board has decided to amend said resolutions so that they will speak the truth, and will include such essential facts as were omitted, and the board of education has adopted the following resolution, as an amendment to its resolution adopted 3 July, 1933, to wit: *Page 334

"`Whereas, under authority of law certain local school districts of Pender County, by a majority vote of the qualified voters of each district, and in accordance with law, have issued and caused to be sold certain bonds, or have lawfully borrowed money from the State, the names of said districts being as follows, the amount of the bonds and State loans outstanding on 3 July, 1933, being placed opposite the name of each district listed below, to wit:

Date Amt. of Amt. of outstanding District Bonds Sale Issue 7-3-33

Atkinson Special School Taxing District 7-1-25 $25,000 $18,000 Burgaw Special School District ....... 11-15-26 50,000 44,000 Long Creek Grady Special School Taxing District ...................... 7-1-25 25,000 18,000 Rocky Point Special School Taxing District ......................... 7-1-25 30,000 23,000 Topsail Special School Taxing District 11-1-24 60,000 44,000 ------- ------- Total District Bonds ........... $190,000 Total Outstanding Bonds, 7-3-33.. $147,000

July 3, 1933 Date of Amt. State Loans, Literary Fund Loan Amount outstanding

Atkinson Special School Taxing District 2-11-94 $5,000 $ 500.00 Atkinson Special School Taxing District 2-10-26 1,500 450.00 Long Creek Grady Special School Taxing District ........................... 2-11-24 5,000 500.00 Long Creek Grady Special School Taxing District ......................

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Constantian v. Anson County
93 S.E.2d 163 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Moseley v. Welch
39 S.E.2d 133 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1946)
East Spencer v. . Rowan County
193 S.E. 837 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Town of East Spencer v. Rowan County
212 N.C. 425 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 S.E. 265, 210 N.C. 331, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshburn-v-brown-nc-1936.