Marshall v. Yoos

Appellate Court of Illinois

Marshall v. Yoos

17 Ill. App. 298, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 330

DecidedSeptember 24, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Ill. App. 298 (Marshall v. Yoos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. Yoos, 17 Ill. App. 298, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 330 (Ill. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Pillsbury, P. J.

¡Replevin instituted before a justice of the peace to recover possession of a cow, and after trial appealed to circuit court, where, at the August term, 1884, a trial was had before the court, a jury being waived. The court took the matter under advisement, and as appears from the bill of exceptions, on the 29th day of December, 1884, in vacation, found the issues for the defendant, from which the plaintiff was allowed an appeal. On examination the record discloses the fact that no judgment has ever been entered in the circuit court upon such finding of the judge in vacation. Hntil such judgment be entered there is nothing to appeal from, the finding of the court in vacation not being a final judgment within the statute authorizing an appeal. Owens v. Crossett, 104 Ill. 468; Hook v. Richeson, 106 Ill. 392. The appeal must be dismissed.”

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pillsbury, P. J.

¡Replevin instituted before a justice of the peace to recover possession of a cow, and after trial appealed to circuit court, where, at the August term, 1884, a trial was had before the court, a jury being waived. The court took the matter under advisement, and as appears from the bill of exceptions, on the 29th day of December, 1884, in vacation, found the issues for the defendant, from which the plaintiff was allowed an appeal. On examination the record discloses the fact that no judgment has ever been entered in the circuit court upon such finding of the judge in vacation. Hntil such judgment be entered there is nothing to appeal from, the finding of the court in vacation not being a final judgment within the statute authorizing an appeal. Owens v. Crossett, 104 Ill. 468; Hook v. Richeson, 106 Ill. 392. The appeal must be dismissed.”

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Ill. App. 298, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-yoos-illappct-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack