Marshall v. Williams

D. Nevada

Marshall v. Williams

DecidedJanuary 3, 2023

Docket2:21-cv-02046

StatusUnknown

This text of Marshall v. Williams (Marshall v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. Williams, (D. Nev. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA PRENTICE MARSHALL, Case No. 2:21-cv-02046-APG-BNW 4 Petitioner, | Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Exhibit under Seal v. [ECF No. 53] CALVIN JOHNSON, et al., 7 Respondents. 8 9 Before the Court is the Respondents’ motion for leave to file document under seal. ECF No. 53. The Respondents seek leave to file one document under seal: Petitioner’s Presentence 11} Investigation Report (“PSI”), dated July 26, 2015. ECF Nos. 53, 54-1. Under Nevada law, the PSI is “confidential and must not be made a part of any public record.” NRS § 176.156(5). Having reviewed and considered the matter in accordance with Kamakana v. City and County of 14} Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and its progeny, I find that a compelling need to protect the Petitioner’s safety, privacy, and/or personal identifying information outweighs the 16]| public interest in open access to court records. 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that the motion to seal (ECF No. 53) is granted. Exhibit 280 (ECF No. 54-1) is considered properly filed under seal. 19 Dated: January 3, 2023 Z : 20 ANDREW P. GORDON 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA PRENTICE MARSHALL, Case No. 2:21-cv-02046-APG-BNW 4 Petitioner, | Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Exhibit under Seal v. [ECF No. 53] CALVIN JOHNSON, et al., 7 Respondents. 8 9 Before the Court is the Respondents’ motion for leave to file document under seal. ECF No. 53. The Respondents seek leave to file one document under seal: Petitioner’s Presentence 11} Investigation Report (“PSI”), dated July 26, 2015. ECF Nos. 53, 54-1. Under Nevada law, the PSI is “confidential and must not be made a part of any public record.” NRS § 176.156(5). Having reviewed and considered the matter in accordance with Kamakana v. City and County of 14} Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and its progeny, I find that a compelling need to protect the Petitioner’s safety, privacy, and/or personal identifying information outweighs the 16]| public interest in open access to court records. 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that the motion to seal (ECF No. 53) is granted. Exhibit 280 (ECF No. 54-1) is considered properly filed under seal. 19 Dated: January 3, 2023 Z : 20 ANDREW P. GORDON 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Marshall v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-williams-nvd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack