Marshall v. United States Postal Service

183 F. App'x 950
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 8, 2006·No. No. 2006-3217·Published

Opinion

[951]*951ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. United States Postal Service, 183 F. App'x 950 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

183 F. App'x 950 (Marshall v. United States Postal Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.