Marshall v. Thompson
This text of Marshall v. Thompson (Marshall v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6243
EARL T. MARSHALL, III,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
W. J. THOMPSON, Warden; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-140-1)
Submitted: November 3, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998
Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl T. Marshall, III, Appellant Pro Se. Rita R. Valdrini, As- sistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Earl T. Marshall, III, appeals from a district court order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994).
In light of our recent decision in Pelissero v. Thompson, 155 F.3d
470 (4th Cir. 1998), we affirm the district court’s denial of
relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marshall v. Thompson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-thompson-ca4-1998.