Marshall v. . Stine
This text of 17 S.E. 495 (Marshall v. . Stine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants asked the Court verbally for an instruction to the jury. The failure to grant a prayer for instruction not asked in writing is not ground for exception. The Code, §415. Besides, if the prayer had been asked in writing, though the failure to give it is deemed excepted to, the exception would have been waived, as it is not set out in the case on appeal, and we could not pass upon it. Taylor v. Plumber, 105 N. C., 56.
No exception of any-kind appears in the case on appeal, and no error appears upon an inspection of the record proper. The judgment below must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 S.E. 495, 112 N.C. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-stine-nc-1893.