Marshall v. . Stine

17 S.E. 495, 112 N.C. 697
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Clark, J.:

The appellants asked the Court verbally for an instruction to the jury. The failure to grant a prayer for instruction not asked in writing is not ground for exception. The Code, §415. Besides, if the prayer had been asked in writing, though the failure to give it is deemed excepted to, the exception would have been waived, as it is not set out in the case on appeal, and we could not pass upon it. Taylor v. Plumber, 105 N. C., 56.

No exception of any-kind appears in the case on appeal, and no error appears upon an inspection of the record proper. The judgment below must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. . Stine, 17 S.E. 495, 112 N.C. 697 (N.C. 1893).

17 S.E. 495 (Marshall v. . Stine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Blankenship
23 S.E. 455 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)