Marshall v. . Stine

17 S.E. 495, 112 N.C. 697
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 S.E. 495 (Marshall v. . Stine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. . Stine, 17 S.E. 495, 112 N.C. 697 (N.C. 1893).

Opinion

Clark, J.:

The appellants asked the Court verbally for an instruction to the jury. The failure to grant a prayer for instruction not asked in writing is not ground for exception. The Code, §415. Besides, if the prayer had been asked in writing, though the failure to give it is deemed excepted to, the exception would have been waived, as it is not set out in the case on appeal, and we could not pass upon it. Taylor v. Plumber, 105 N. C., 56.

No exception of any-kind appears in the case on appeal, and no error appears upon an inspection of the record proper. The judgment below must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Blankenship
23 S.E. 455 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 S.E. 495, 112 N.C. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-stine-nc-1893.