Marshall v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Marshall v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC.

759 N.W.2d 891, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 26, 2009 WL 261497

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 28, 2009

DocketA08-1673

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 759 N.W.2d 891 (Marshall v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., 759 N.W.2d 891, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 26, 2009 WL 261497 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 26, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Eric J. Magnuson Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI