Marshall v. State

13 Tex. Ct. App. 492, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 35
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 17, 1883
DocketNo. 1475
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Tex. Ct. App. 492 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. State, 13 Tex. Ct. App. 492, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 35 (Tex. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

Hurt, J.

Louis Marshall was convicted of an aggravated assault.

The information charges that “Louis Marshall did, on or about the twenty-fifth day of February, A. D. 1882, in the said county of Fort Bend, State of Texas, make an aggravated assault upon one Thomas Tolliver,” etc. For an aggravated assault this information is fatally defective.

There is no act, fact or ground of aggravation charged. (Key v. The State, 12 Texas Ct. App., 506.) It being sufficient.for simple assault (the case of Pierce v. The State, 26 Texas, 114, having been overruled), we will not dismiss the prosecution, but remand the cause for trial upon that charge.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion delivered February 17, 1883.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pierce
26 Tex. 114 (Texas Supreme Court, 1861)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Tex. Ct. App. 492, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-texapp-1883.