Marshall v. State

1982 OK CR 76, 646 P.2d 611, 1982 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 2, 1982
DocketNo. F-81-383
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1982 OK CR 76 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. State, 1982 OK CR 76, 646 P.2d 611, 1982 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275 (Okla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinions

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

On appeal from his conviction in Comanche County District Court, Case No. CRF-80-123, of Aggravated Assault and Battery upon a Police Officer, the appellant, in his sole assignment of error, argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish the element of aggravation required by 21 O.S. 1981, § 650, in conjunction with 21 O.S. 1981, § 646.

On March 1, 1980, while attempting to serve an arrest warrant on the defendant’s brother, Melvin, Officer Kenneth Stradley of the Lawton Police Department and the defendant became engaged in a fight. The officer received a blow to the face which resulted in a gash which bled profusely and required fifteen (15) stitches; further, he testified he had two busted teeth. With the assistance of two fellow officers, Stradley subdued the defendant and personally transported him to jail. Officer Stradley’s injuries were treated at a hospital, but he stated that he was never admitted to it, although he did return to the hospital a couple of days later to have his stitches removed. No medical testimony was presented on behalf of the State.

Title 21 O.S.1981, § 646, reads as follows:

An assault and battery becomes aggravated when committed under any of the following circumstances:
(1) When great bodily injury is inflicted upon the person assaulted;
(2) When committed by a person of robust health or strength upon one who is aged or decrepit.

The statute was construed in an opinion by Judge Nix in Herrington v. State, 352 P.2d 931 (Okl.Cr.1960), citing from a Nebraska case as follows:

The term ‘great bodily injury,’ as employed in the Criminal Code is not susceptible of a precise definition, but implies an injury of a graver or more serious character than an ordinary battery.

When viewed in the most favorable light to the State, the injuries in the instant case were not so egregious as to be the results of [613]*613anything more than a simple assault and battery. Such evidence was not sufficient to support a verdict of aggravated assault and battery. See, Cox v. State, 361 P.2d 506 (Okl.Cr.1961); and, Minnix v. State, 282 P.2d 772 (Okl.Cr.1955).

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is modified from a term of two (2) years’ imprisonment and a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for Aggravated Assault and Battery upon a Police Officer, in violation of 21 O.S.1981, § 650, to a sentence of six (6) months’ in the county jail and a fine of five hundred dollars ($500) for Assault and Battery upon a Police Officer, in violation of 21 O.S.1981, § 649, and as so MODIFIED, the judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P. J., concurs. CORNISH, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Williams
559 F.3d 1143 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1982 OK CR 76, 646 P.2d 611, 1982 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-oklacrimapp-1982.