Marshall v. State

1953 OK CR 176, 264 P.2d 770, 97 Okla. Crim. 398, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 341
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided December 16, 1953·No. A-11877·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

POWELL, P. J.

Here the defendant was charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county with the unlawful possession of one-half pint of intoxicating liquor, with the intention to sell.

The possession of such quantity of liquor would not have been unlawful if for the personal use of the accused. Tit. 37 O.S. 1951 § 82; Thomas v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 404, 106 P. 2d 836. On trial the state would have been required to produce competent evidence tending to show such intent. But the accused entered a plea of guilty, and was by the court fined $75, and costs, and sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail. Appeal has been perfected to this court, but brief in support of the petition in error has not been filed.

We find no error in the record, and the case is affirmed.

JONES and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 1953 OK CR 176, 264 P.2d 770, 97 Okla. Crim. 398, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 341 (Okla. Ct. App. 1953).

1953 OK CR 176 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alred v. State
1960 OK CR 35 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1960)
Treadway v. State
1959 OK CR 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
La Santa v. State
1957 OK CR 68 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1957)