Marshall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Marshall v. State

1925 OK CR 179, 234 P. 1117, 30 Okla. Crim. 30, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 179

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 4, 1925

DocketNo. A-4901.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 179 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. State, 1925 OK CR 179, 234 P. 1117, 30 Okla. Crim. 30, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 179 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bill Marshall, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling whisky to Russ Artman on the 8th day of July, 1922, with his punishment assessed at a fine of $250 and 90 days’ confinement in the county jail. Upon a due showing made by the attorney for the plaintiff in error and the Attorney General, it appears that the plaintiff in error is now deceased. It is therefore ordered that the proceedings here be abated, and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bill Marshall, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling whisky to Russ Artman on the 8th day of July, 1922, with his punishment assessed at a fine of $250 and 90 days’ confinement in the county jail. Upon a due showing made by the attorney for the plaintiff in error and the Attorney General, it appears that the plaintiff in error is now deceased. It is therefore ordered that the proceedings here be abated, and the appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 179, 234 P. 1117, 30 Okla. Crim. 30, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.