Marshall v. State

1919 OK CR 103, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 689, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 64
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 10, 1919
DocketNo. A-3173.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 103 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. State, 1919 OK CR 103, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 689, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 64 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Frank Marshall, was convicted in the county court of Comanche county on a charge that he did have possession of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, and his punishment was fixed at thirty days’ confinement in the county jail and a fine of $50. He appeals from the judgment rendered on the verdict. The proof on the part of the state was uncontroverted. An examination of the record discloses that the errors assigned are destitute of merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 103, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 689, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.