Marshall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Marshall v. State

313 S.W.3d 234, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 796, 2010 WL 2378754

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 2010·No. ED 94048·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Eric R. Marshall, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Eric R. Marshall, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Marshall v. State, 313 S.W.3d 234, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 796, 2010 WL 2378754 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

313 S.W.3d 234 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.