Marshall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Marshall v. State

863 S.W.2d 674, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1665, 1993 WL 429213

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 1993·No. No. 63760·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jefferson Marshall, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of convictions sought to be vacated were for burglary in the first degree and unlawful use of a weapon for which movant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of seven years and five years respectively.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jefferson Marshall, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of convictions sought to be vacated were for burglary in the first degree and unlawful use of a weapon for which movant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of seven years and five years respectively.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Marshall v. State, 863 S.W.2d 674, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1665, 1993 WL 429213 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

863 S.W.2d 674 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.