Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Marshall v. State

Marshall v. State

127 So. 3d 720, 2013 WL 6122227, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18571
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13494 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2013·No. No. 5D13-848·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a review of the presentence investigation report, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing drug and alcohol treatment related requirements as special conditions of probation. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); Austin v. State, 67 So.3d 403, 406-07 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 127 So. 3d 720, 2013 WL 6122227, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18571 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

127 So. 3d 720 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biller v. State
618 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Austin v. State
67 So. 3d 403 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)