Marshall v. State
47 So. 3d 965, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17680, 2010 WL 4628596
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 983 So. 2d 680 →
Opinion
We reverse the order denying defendant’s post-conviction relief motion. The defendant should have been allowed to amend his motion to assert that the record shows that he is entitled to the credit for time served. The scoresheet attached to the order of May 20, 2010, does not address the question of credit for time served. If the court again denies the motion, it shall attach portions of the record demonstrating that the defendant is not entitled to the relief he seeks.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marshall v. State, 47 So. 3d 965, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17680, 2010 WL 4628596 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
47 So. 3d 965 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.