Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Marshall v. State

Marshall v. State

35 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6945, 2010 WL 1979268
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 2010·No. 4D09-3209·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. A rule 3.800(a) motion cannot be used to challenge the factual basis for a plea. See Sanchez v. State, 979 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 35 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6945, 2010 WL 1979268 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

35 So. 3d 121 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
78 So. 3d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
GURTH v. State
50 So. 3d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)