Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Marshall v. State

Marshall v. State

940 So. 2d 1173, 2006 WL 2741649
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 915 So. 2d 264 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 2006·No. 1D06-2109·Published

Opinion

940 So.2d 1173 (2006)

Warren MARSHALL, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D06-2109.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 27, 2006.
Rehearing Denied November 9, 2006.

Warren Marshall, pro se, Petitioner.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Diego Puig, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

BENTON, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 940 So. 2d 1173, 2006 WL 2741649 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

940 So. 2d 1173 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.