Marshall v. State

352 So. 2d 1269, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16899
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1977·No. No. 77-999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court revoking appellant’s probation. See Thomas v. State, 317 So.2d 450 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). However, we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. We remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 352 So. 2d 1269, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

352 So. 2d 1269 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
352 So. 2d 1269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)