Marshall v. State
112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 682
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 500 →
Opinion
The court has considered this case en banc, and after reading the entire record it is the opinion of the court that the trial court admitted error in refusing to grant tp tlie .defendant a new trial upon his motion. - The -judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marshall v. State, 112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).
112 So. 923 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.