Marshall v. State

112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 682
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 12, 1927
Docket7 Div. 299.
StatusPublished

This text of 112 So. 923 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. State, 112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

PER CURIAM-.

The court has considered this case en banc, and after reading the entire record it is the opinion of the court that the trial court admitted error in refusing to grant tp tlie .defendant a new trial upon his motion. - The -judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-alactapp-1927.