Marshall v. Shockley
Opinion
William D. Marshall, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and agree with the reasoning of the district court. See Marshall v. Shockley, No. CA-02-2328-L (D.Md. July 23, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
48 F. App'x 905 (Marshall v. Shockley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.