Marshall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-0493V
KAJA MARSHALL, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, v. Filed: June 11, 2024
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Neil Bhargava, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On April 11, 2023, Kaja Marshall filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.1 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she developed a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as the result of a Meningococcal-B vaccination she received on April 21, 2022. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters (“OSM”).
On March 27, 2024, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On June 10, 2024, Respondent filed a Proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”). Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. at 1 – 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, I award the following compensation:
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. A lump sum of $50,540.56 (representing $48,500.00 for pain and suffering, and $2,040.56 for past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Proffer at 2. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.2
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
KAJA MARSHALL,
Petitioner,
v. No. 23-493V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On February 9, 2023, Kaja Marshall filed a petition for compensation under the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”),
alleging that she suffered a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”),
as the result of a meningococcal-B vaccination she received on April 21, 2022. Petition at 1. On
March 25, 2024, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c)
Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a
SIRVA Table injury, and on March 27, 2024, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on
Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 19; ECF No. 20.
I. Items of Compensation
A. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $48,500.00 in pain and suffering.
See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
1 B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that petitioner incurred past unreimbursable
expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $2,040.56. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
lump sum payments as described below and requests that the Special Master’s decision and the
Court’s judgment award the following1:
A. A lump sum payment of $ 50,540.56, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
A. Lump sum payable to petitioner, Kaja Marshall $50,540.56
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future, unreimbursed expenses, future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 /s/ Neil Bhargava NEIL BHARGAVA Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 305-3989 Date: June 10, 2024 neil.bhargava@usdoj.gov
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marshall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Marshall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.