Marshall v. S. Ohio Correctional Facility

2009 Ohio 7155
CourtOhio Court of Claims
DecidedNovember 19, 2009
Docket2009-05072-AD
StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 7155 (Marshall v. S. Ohio Correctional Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. S. Ohio Correctional Facility, 2009 Ohio 7155 (Ohio Super. Ct. 2009).

Opinion

[Cite as Marshall v. S. Ohio Correctional Facility, 2009-Ohio-7155.]

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

ERNEST MARSHALL

Plaintiff

v.

SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

Defendant

Case No. 2009-05072-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT {¶ 1} 1) Plaintiff, Ernest Marshall, an inmate incarcerated at defendant, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (SOCF), filed this action alleging his six compact discs were lost when he was transferred from the Ohio State Penitentiary (OSP) to SOCF in December 2007. Plaintiff originally requested damages in the amount of $90.00 for the loss of his six compact discs. Payment of the filing fee was waived. {¶ 2} 2) Defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability for the loss of five compact discs, but disputing plaintiff’s damage claim. Defendant explained five compact discs were confiscated from plaintiff’s possession on November 8, 2007 by OSP staff and subsequently placed in long term storage. Defendant further explained plaintiff was transferred to SOCF on December 28, 2007 and a long term storage form was completed for plaintiff’s property which listed five compact discs. Defendant stated it “has been unable to determine what happened to plaintiff’s property that was held in long term storage.” Consequently, defendant admitted liability for the loss of five compact discs and acknowledged plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of $60.00. {¶ 3} 3) Plaintiff filed a response expressing his agreement to accept $60.00 in damages for the loss of five compact discs. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW {¶ 4} 1) Negligence on the part of defendant has been shown in respect to all property claimed. Baisden v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (1977), 76-0617-AD. Defendant is liable to plaintiff in the amount of $60.00.

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $60.00. Court costs are assessed against defendant. DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Ernest Marshall, #A304-942 Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel P.O. Box 45699 Department of Rehabilitation Lucasville, Ohio 45699 and Correction 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222

RDK/laa 10/23 Filed 11/19/09 Sent to S.C. reporter 3/5/10

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 7155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-s-ohio-correctional-facility-ohioctcl-2009.