Marshall v. Richter
This text of 227 A.D. 830 (Marshall v. Richter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that it is undisputed that the plaintiff violated the statute by failing to pass to the right of the center of the intersecting streets, which was one of the proximate causes of the collision and which made him guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. [134 Mise. 56.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 A.D. 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-richter-nyappdiv-1929.