Marshall v. Reed

61 A. 945, 21 Del. 462, 5 Penne. 462, 1905 Del. LEXIS 41
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided October 11, 1905·No. No. 65·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

The language of our statute is, that the Justice shall “ deliver a duly certified transcript of all the docket entries in the case.”

[463] Mr. Richardson:—This certificate says a full and true copy of all the entries of record in the above case of Theodore Reed vs. John Marshall.” I hold that that is a compliance with the statutory requirements.

Penrewill, J.:—Would not all the entries of record, Mr. White, be even broader than all the docket entries”—would not the greater include the less ?

Mr. White:—“ The docket entries ” also includes all the entries ; yet the Court decided in an appeal case at this term that those words were not sufficient in the certificate and dismissed the appeal on that ground.

Lore, C. J.:—The Court thinks that the certificate is sufficient.

The application to dismiss the appeal is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. Reed, 61 A. 945, 21 Del. 462, 5 Penne. 462, 1905 Del. LEXIS 41 (Del. Ct. App. 1905).

61 A. 945 (Marshall v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stellar v. Long
97 A. 418 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1916)