Marshall v. Reed

Superior Court of Delaware

Marshall v. Reed

61 A. 945, 21 Del. 462, 5 Penne. 462, 1905 Del. LEXIS 41

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedOctober 11, 1905

DocketNo. 65

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A. 945 (Marshall v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. Reed, 61 A. 945, 21 Del. 462, 5 Penne. 462, 1905 Del. LEXIS 41 (Del. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

The language of our statute is, that the Justice shall “ deliver a duly certified transcript of all the docket entries in the case.”

[463]*463Mr. Richardson:—This certificate says “ a full and true copy of all the entries of record in the above case of Theodore Reed vs. John Marshall.” I hold that that is a compliance with the statutory requirements.

Penrewill, J.:—Would not all the entries of record, Mr. White, be even broader than “ all the docket entries”—would not the greater include the less ?

Mr. White:—“ The docket entries ” also includes all the entries ; yet the Court decided in an appeal case at this term that those words were not sufficient in the certificate and dismissed the appeal on that ground.

Lore, C. J.:—The Court thinks that the certificate is sufficient.

The application to dismiss the appeal is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI