Marshall v. PRICELINE. COM INCORPORATED
This text of 7 A.3d 485 (Marshall v. PRICELINE. COM INCORPORATED) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JEANNE MARSHALL, an individual, and CRAIG KNIGHT, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants,
v.
PRICELINE.COM INCORPORATED, Defendant Below, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Before BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.
ORDER
JACK B. JACOBS, Justice.
This 14th day of October 2010, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, and their contentions in oral argument, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in its decision dated March 8, 2010.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.3d 485, 2010 WL 4018429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-priceline-com-incorporated-del-2010.