Marshall v. Pleasants
This text of Marshall v. Pleasants (Marshall v. Pleasants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the time of or subsequent to entry of the March 6, 2007 Order on reconsideration by the Full Commission, defendant entered into the custody of the Department of Correction. The Full Commission has now been advised that defendant is no longer in State custody and the hearing ordered on March 6, 2007, should now be scheduled.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is reopened and reset for hearing before a Deputy Commissioner on defendant's failure to appear pursuant to the 29 October 2004 Order to Show Cause entered by Chief Deputy Commissioner Stephen Gheen. The Deputy Commissioner shall collect the evidence and forward it to the Full Commission for decision and appoint an attorney for defendant if it appears that incarceration could result from defendant's conduct. The parties will receive calendar notification of the date, time and place of hearing *Page 3 from the Deputy Commissioner. Defendant is directed to appear and defendant shall notify the Full Commission within 15 days from the date of this Order of his current mailing address.
This the __ day of August 2007.
S/________________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
*Page 1S/________________________ DANNY LEE McDONALD COMMISSIONER
S/________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marshall v. Pleasants, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-pleasants-ncworkcompcom-2007.