Marshall v. Mitchell
34 Me. 227
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Me. 221 →
Opinion
The opinion of the Court, Shepley, C. J., Tenney, Howard, Rice and Appleton, J. J., was delivered by
orally. — The case does not satisfactorily show that the defendant had sufficient security, by the mortgage, nor that the mortgage embraced all the property which the maker owned. He had therefore a right to notice.
Action to stand for trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marshall v. Mitchell, 34 Me. 227 (Me. 1852).
34 Me. 227 (Marshall v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.