Marshall v. Mitchell

34 Me. 227
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Me. 221
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1852·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court, Shepley, C. J., Tenney, Howard, Rice and Appleton, J. J., was delivered by

Danforth and Woods, for the defendant.

Howard, J.,

orally. — The case does not satisfactorily show that the defendant had sufficient security, by the mortgage, nor that the mortgage embraced all the property which the maker owned. He had therefore a right to notice.

Action to stand for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. Mitchell, 34 Me. 227 (Me. 1852).

34 Me. 227 (Marshall v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.