Marshall v. Miller

Connecticut Superior Court

Marshall v. Miller

1 Conn. Super. Ct. 27

DecidedJuly 15, 1788

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 27 (Marshall v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. Miller, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 27 (Colo. Ct. App. 1788).

Pincite

Opinion

Bythe Court:

(Judge Dyer abfent)

If one joint obligor is difcharged by aft of the obligee, it is prefumed that he hath received fatiffaftion and therefore is a difcharge of the obligation, but if one of the joint obligors dies or is difcharged by aft of the legiflature, which does not extend to the other, no such preemption arifes, and therefore the other is liable alone to pay the debt.—

See the rules and principles of law on this point confidered and ftated more fully in a late cafe — Mortimer againfi Caldwell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bythe Court:

(Judge Dyer abfent)

If one joint obligor is difcharged by aft of the obligee, it is prefumed that he hath received fatiffaftion and therefore is a difcharge of the obligation, but if one of the joint obligors dies or is difcharged by aft of the legiflature, which does not extend to the other, no such preemption arifes, and therefore the other is liable alone to pay the debt.—

See the rules and principles of law on this point confidered and ftated more fully in a late cafe — Mortimer againfi Caldwell.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Conn. Super. Ct. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-miller-connsuperct-1788.