Marshall v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Marshall v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission

122 S.E. 926, 187 N.C. 858, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 427

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 30, 1924·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s chief exceptions, as stressed on the argument and in its brief, are those directed to portions of the court’s charge on the measure of damages. Construing the charge as a whole, as we are required to do, we do not think it is susceptible to any serious defect. The case seems to have been tried in substantial compliance with the law' bearing on the subject, and no ruling or action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

The validity of the proceeding will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s chief exceptions, as stressed on the argument and in its brief, are those directed to portions of the court’s charge on the measure of damages. Construing the charge as a whole, as we are required to do, we do not think it is susceptible to any serious defect. The case seems to have been tried in substantial compliance with the law' bearing on the subject, and no ruling or action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

The validity of the proceeding will be upheld.

No error.

Marshall v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission, 122 S.E. 926, 187 N.C. 858, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 427 (N.C. 1924).

Pincite

122 S.E. 926 (Marshall v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.