Marshall v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission
This text of 122 S.E. 926 (Marshall v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s chief exceptions, as stressed on the argument and in its brief, are those directed to portions of the court’s charge on the measure of damages. Construing the charge as a whole, as we are required to do, we do not think it is susceptible to any serious defect. The case seems to have been tried in substantial compliance with the law' bearing on the subject, and no ruling or action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.
The validity of the proceeding will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 S.E. 926, 187 N.C. 858, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-mecklenburg-highway-commission-nc-1924.