Marshall v. McBride

739 So. 2d 728, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12130, 1999 WL 729089
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 10, 1999
DocketNo. 99-0658
StatusPublished

This text of 739 So. 2d 728 (Marshall v. McBride) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. McBride, 739 So. 2d 728, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12130, 1999 WL 729089 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timothy McBride challenges the order entered by the trial court denying his motion to set aside a clerk’s default. See Fla.R.Civ .P. 1.500(a). The default was entered against Mr. McBride in an action filed by appellee, Laura McBride, seeking an annulment of the parties’ marriage. Our review reveals that no basis for rever[729]*729sal has been demonstrated. Cf. Walker v. Boyce, 734 So.2d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

ANTOON, C.J., HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Boyce
734 So. 2d 578 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
739 So. 2d 728, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12130, 1999 WL 729089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-mcbride-fladistctapp-1999.